If he's found guilty, then I'd prefer to see him get sentenced to community service.

[...wait for it...]

Six months wih DPW.

Well this was the last couple of lines of the original post:

So. What do you think should Addis' punishment should be? Jail? For how long? A fine? How much? Probation? What conditions? Guilty by reason of insanity? What then?

Just stating my opinion. And justifying why my opinion is what it is. Arson is no joke, especially not when you have experienced it first hand.

Actually asshat, the word is spelled d-i-l-u-t-e-d as in 'thin', 'weak' and 'diminished'. And in particular "to decrease the per share value of (common stock) by increasing the total number of shares". Multiple shares of stupidity do not make something any less stupid. As in you and your mob of devoted and blind fools.

As I know the meaning of deluded that would mean you were deceived or tricked, when obviously you're just flat out ignorant of the way the law works and what is and what is not morally right.

I don't care how many of you come at me in the eyes of the law you're wrong.

Even if what's his face is depressed it does not excuse his actions. If he’s lucky they’re commit him.

Just because something is slated to be burned does not lessen the crime that it was burned by arson early. Are you that naive? You people have no concept of the law and how it works. Let's say a convicted criminal is on death row and you go out and shoot him on his way to the execution. Is that okay? Because that is what you are saying about Burning Man being a victim of arson. You would be charged and convicted of murder. Think about it. Take a deep breath and really think about it. The law is the law.

I only wish these threads were all on one post because I am tired of reiterating things I have already said.

This is the last time I am posting on anything to do with this.

In the end nothing we say or do is going to matter. In the end it is Nevada law that will decide the fate of the accused. My opinions here are based solely on what the law is and therefore what he deserves thereby. Understand? In a way I hope they are lenient, but knowing the conservative morals of Nevada I would say your man is in DEEP shit.

Okay, talk your shit because if you take the time you will note that I am no longer subscribed to this tribe and I will not return to read your lame responses anymore.

And for the record Fuck You Danger Angel.

Just because someone has an opinion does not mean it is the best opinion of all possible opinions. Some are better than others. Evolution anyone? Paul expressed his opinion and now he is facing consequences of reality. He could have avoided possible time by trying to improved his opinion by making some judgements about other people's opinions and thereby coming up with a new opinion that was better than the opinion he held before. Or he could stick with his own opinion, which he did, and now we all can come up with our own opinions about his opinion. You see what my opinion is?

Just because everyone has opinions doesn't mean that some are functionally better than others. So saying, "everyone is entitled to their own opinion" is only half the story and sometimes is used as a cop out for bad or ignorant behavior and thoughts.

I also suspect that any DA or prosecutor involved will think it is a highly risible case, and not personally WANT to be involved...not exactly a career maker... but certainly likely to draw a lot of lunatics into the public discourse.... with that in mind - I think it maybe a highly plea likely case....with very little time to be served.

maybe I watch too much law and order.

He's an actor. A felony conviction would have zero negative effect on his career.