Advertisement
Some feel the premature burning of The Man was arson, others feel it was awesome radical expression, others feel it was a minor pain in the ass that proved our event is not about The Man, and others feel it created an opportunity to demonstrate the teamwork our community engenders. I feel torching The Man was a terrorist act against the environment in impact if not intent, and that you should feel the same way – here’s why:
This was the year Burning Man hoped to expand far beyond the Black Rock to become an important force for positive change on the planet before it is too late to save it/us. Hundreds of us spent months creating a Man Base like none before; a giant stage filled with engaging green inventions and art executed not by big corporations but by inventive burners. We created it to enable 50,000 of the world’s brightest out-of-the-box doers to interact in a great green mash-up of open-source inventiveness, and then take 50,000 resulting new ideas out to default. It was about focusing a critical mass of burners on a vital topic, and expecting the serendipitous result to be far more positive than any negative impact of the event itself.
It didn’t happen that way, because one asshole lit the Man on fire to be cool, the heart of the green theme was closed most of the week, and the remaining exhibits were jumbled up or not put back together once the Man Base finally opened. Without the green center of this year’s theme to stimulate communal interactivity about environmental change, I feel the event reverted to what it has been accused of being in the past – a giant party in the desert, the world’s coolest interactive art exhibition, an amazing artist community’s annual reunion, an opportunity to experience spectacular pyro, and all the other things we know and love or hate.
Been there, done that, and I’d do it again tomorrow. But this year was supposed to be different, important, powerful, and relevant to the entire world. Instead, our theme was slaughtered - we’ll never know just what we lost, nor the price the planet will pay for it – which I am convinced, will be large. Yes, The Man burned Saturday night, but the Man burn was pretty unimpressive, don’t you think? It’s never been about that anyway…
I hope those few of us who found a way to create green mash-ups despite the environmental terrorism will salvage at least a bit of the original intent – in my case, the Pavilion connected me with Vinay Gupta, and we plan to co-create a radically green and radically superior approach to sheltering refugees and disaster victims by integrating Hexayurt and Playatech technologies (see hexayurt.com and playatech.com and imagine 100x greener, 10x cheaper, and 10x sooner than FEMA trailers). If you have any planet-friendly ideas to contribute to dirt-cheap off-grid shelter systems that a few starving refugees can assemble into a village in hours without tools or expertise, please get in touch. I’m sorry I missed you in the Pavilion; I was out touring art and dancing while DPW used most of my installation to treat overheated construction crews during the Man rebuild. At least DPW loved my project, so my personal disappointment must be far less than what other exhibitors must feel, and and it certainly pales compared to my disappointment about the collapse of this year’s important theme.
As far as I am concerned, it would be fitting to strap Paul Addis to the Thunderdome until everyone who participated in creating the Man Base has 10 minutes with him. It wouldn’t make up for the price the planet paid, but like burning our OWN art, it might at least clear out our energies enough to help us quickly move on to whatever the next dream needs to be.
So sorry you all missed the Pavilion. Pre-opening, I peed in a bottle to feed algae that sucks genny fumes from the air and sequesters carbon. Perhaps some VC could scale that idea into reusing big city sewage to clean the air instead of “treating” it, but the VCs were all at a rave camp…
I get that at Burning Man, you never know what you’re gonna get, good or bad – but trashing this particular Man was a big big bad for us all.
Sunshine
This was the year Burning Man hoped to expand far beyond the Black Rock to become an important force for positive change on the planet before it is too late to save it/us. Hundreds of us spent months creating a Man Base like none before; a giant stage filled with engaging green inventions and art executed not by big corporations but by inventive burners. We created it to enable 50,000 of the world’s brightest out-of-the-box doers to interact in a great green mash-up of open-source inventiveness, and then take 50,000 resulting new ideas out to default. It was about focusing a critical mass of burners on a vital topic, and expecting the serendipitous result to be far more positive than any negative impact of the event itself.
It didn’t happen that way, because one asshole lit the Man on fire to be cool, the heart of the green theme was closed most of the week, and the remaining exhibits were jumbled up or not put back together once the Man Base finally opened. Without the green center of this year’s theme to stimulate communal interactivity about environmental change, I feel the event reverted to what it has been accused of being in the past – a giant party in the desert, the world’s coolest interactive art exhibition, an amazing artist community’s annual reunion, an opportunity to experience spectacular pyro, and all the other things we know and love or hate.
Been there, done that, and I’d do it again tomorrow. But this year was supposed to be different, important, powerful, and relevant to the entire world. Instead, our theme was slaughtered - we’ll never know just what we lost, nor the price the planet will pay for it – which I am convinced, will be large. Yes, The Man burned Saturday night, but the Man burn was pretty unimpressive, don’t you think? It’s never been about that anyway…
I hope those few of us who found a way to create green mash-ups despite the environmental terrorism will salvage at least a bit of the original intent – in my case, the Pavilion connected me with Vinay Gupta, and we plan to co-create a radically green and radically superior approach to sheltering refugees and disaster victims by integrating Hexayurt and Playatech technologies (see hexayurt.com and playatech.com and imagine 100x greener, 10x cheaper, and 10x sooner than FEMA trailers). If you have any planet-friendly ideas to contribute to dirt-cheap off-grid shelter systems that a few starving refugees can assemble into a village in hours without tools or expertise, please get in touch. I’m sorry I missed you in the Pavilion; I was out touring art and dancing while DPW used most of my installation to treat overheated construction crews during the Man rebuild. At least DPW loved my project, so my personal disappointment must be far less than what other exhibitors must feel, and and it certainly pales compared to my disappointment about the collapse of this year’s important theme.
As far as I am concerned, it would be fitting to strap Paul Addis to the Thunderdome until everyone who participated in creating the Man Base has 10 minutes with him. It wouldn’t make up for the price the planet paid, but like burning our OWN art, it might at least clear out our energies enough to help us quickly move on to whatever the next dream needs to be.
So sorry you all missed the Pavilion. Pre-opening, I peed in a bottle to feed algae that sucks genny fumes from the air and sequesters carbon. Perhaps some VC could scale that idea into reusing big city sewage to clean the air instead of “treating” it, but the VCs were all at a rave camp…
I get that at Burning Man, you never know what you’re gonna get, good or bad – but trashing this particular Man was a big big bad for us all.
Sunshine
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Wed, September 5, 2007 - 9:54 PM"and you should feel the same way"
BULLSHIT. I probably agree with you, but ANYTIME someone begins a tirade with those words I turn them the fuck off.
"and you should feel the same way"
Throughout the years people have been killed for just that reason. -
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Thu, September 6, 2007 - 9:07 PMGeneral Loofah's got a point. You make perfect sense, but no one should ever say, "and you should feel the same way."
Let people feel what they want to feel, no matter how wrong, vile, evil, or pro-Paul Addis they may be.
-Gabriel
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Fri, September 7, 2007 - 1:01 PMthe war in iraq is wrong but doesn't it just FEEL RIGHT?
LoL at the OJ poster. You are sheep. Baaaaahhhhhh!!!!!
-
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Wed, September 5, 2007 - 10:04 PMyou have GOT to be kidding. if anything, the burning of the man, and the derrick were far more acts of environmental terrorism than burning the man. those burns were SO not green.....
-
Unsu...
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Thu, September 6, 2007 - 4:31 AM"a giant stage filled with engaging green inventions and art executed not by big corporations but by inventive burners. "
And maybe you should read the article in the July issue of Business 2.0 Magazine and find out just which "big corporations" were actually there, which ones spent money to be there - and while not having their advertising at the Man - had it littered all over business magazines and their corporate websites.
BMan, has gone corporate. And attendees are being described as a marketing demographic:
"This community is a dream for anyone looking at demographics," Goodell says. "We have kids who work in coffee shops and we have billionaires. To ignore the value of our brand, the buying power it has, is silly. But it's a ritual for these people, which is why it's going to be hard for them seeing businesses out there." Burning Man's customers keep coming back to Black Rock precisely because it's so far outside the scope of the corporate culture - and its incessant marketing - that most of them live with the other 51 weeks of the year.
So the organization decided that the companies that come this summer will have to play by Burning Man's rules. The first letter inviting corporate participants was pulled off the website after only a few days; Harvey says it made the event sound too much like a trade fair. The revision stated explicitly that no marketing whatsoever would be allowed at the event. "
Yeah, no marketing at the event. But all of the press in trade magazines is HUGE for business.
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Thu, September 6, 2007 - 6:19 AMThe point I'm hearing is that there was an intended element of evolution that the BOrg was trying to instill that didn't get its chance in the petrie dish of BRC. Rather than a move forward to promote positive change forward, the early burn was a hearkening back.
I'm glad the hexyyurts got put to good use.
At least you got the chance to shake your booty.
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Thu, September 6, 2007 - 7:12 AMSunshine, my friend, I hope we get to meet soon. I had a very similar reaction to the Addis thing, but then I thought it through a little and came to a different conclusion.
Here's the first thing: BM.org *could* have rolled with the punches and just kept the pavilion open. I don't think there were safety issues once the Man was down, and if they'd had to, say, move items to the Cafe area and put them around the edge of that space, I'm sure the show could have gone on.
I think, frankly, they bottled out. The Addis thing provided them with a way of ducking the cultural issues around corporate participation at Burning Man, and they took it. Right in the long run because it gives the community more time? Perhaps.
This may sound odd, but I trust their judgment, even when I can't agree with it. They do the impossible, like justifying BM to the authorities in a way that allows us to continue, so that means they don't always have to explain. They just point at what they've done and say, "well, how do you think we did that? Trust Us."
And I do, for the most part.
Here's the other thing, and I'm sorry if this upsets people.
vinay.howtolivewiki.com/blog/h...dis-274
He looks like he has mental health issues, for one thing. But for another, there's something in there, some visible seed of light that's hard not to see. Next year I think we'll understand that perhaps the approach taken to corporate participation taken this year was fatally flawed at some profound philosophical level, and either they should never have been there, or there should have been some entirely more profound rethinking of the role of corporate citizens of Black Rock City.
I *think* what it is, is that Black Rock City needs a "Business District" - an area for corporate theme camps which are essentially as unrestricted and free as anybody else's theme camps - where they can *by god* throw down, show their creativity, and make art too with the rest of us.
Still the absolute bar on sales and marketing but a lot more creative freedom and vision to display their vision of the world.
IF YOU WANT TO COME TO BURNING MAN, CORPORATION, YOU MAKE ART
Just like we did with art cars. Vehicles needed to be constrained to Burning Man culture, and we did it by making sure that they had to play ball with the Playa.
So suppose, next year, there's a Burning Man Business District, and all Corporate Camps have to demonstrate three things.
1> First class environmental performance, or (for companies that are big, old and slow) evidence of tangible improvement in Triple Bottom Line accounting terms. You cannot come unless you are clean. The Playa is barred to companies who have no place in the Future in their current business model.
2> No marketing. Your company comes to the Playa AS A PARTICIPANT. You can use your stuff in your projects, you can ignore it and make art on your own terms, but this is not a goddamn trade show. For example, say Kodak wanted to come to the Playa. Maybe their project is that they give out 5000 digital cameras, and at the end of the week you drop them in boxes on the way out, and they run giant face recognition systems over the photographs, and you can see all the places where you were in the background of a shot, and it's like your Burn Diary (and, of course, you can also opt to have any picture with you in it taken off the web.)
A meditation on privacy and surveillance, brought to you by Kodak. Does it matter, if that art is produced, that it came from a corporation?
Of course not.
Is it marketing? Well, no more so than the art made by individual sculptors who make their living selling sculpture off the playa is marketing. Corporations are made of people, and maybe we should let them play on the same ground that everybody else does.
3> No use of imagery from Burning Man in advertising or marketing.
You come, you make art, you don't get to use your goddamn BURNING MAN BROUGHT TO YOU BY KODAK shots anywhere else. And I think that, given that it's our choice whether we let them participate or not, anybody who's using Playa-like imagery in their advertising (a disturbing trend) can't come either.
The place is sacred and demands to be treated as such.
So, I dunno. Much as I initially wanted to punch Addis in the teeth, Burning Man is too big and to fierce a force for an idiot with a blowtorch to derail *if* it's correctly aligned with it's basic values.
I think of him and his actions as a symptom that corporate participation had not been done right this year.
Even though neither your project nor mine was corporate at all, remember that Treehugger is Discovery Channel, and Current TV is a company, and they introduced us and put us in the Pavilion. We were there as parts of the Corporate Program, and we're evidence that good things *can* come out of corporate participation at Burning Man.
But not, apparently, like this.
Next year, on the Playa, my friend, we'll fix it. -
-
What you were missing - Free/Open Source disaster relief.
Thu, September 6, 2007 - 7:20 AMthis was our project, if you didn't see it:
vinay.howtolivewiki.com/blog/h...aya-280
hexayurt.com
We're rolling with the punches. The big thing is, I think, that the dialog on using hexayurts for response to earthquakes on the West Coast needs to go on. We got a call from FEMA on Thursday about using them, and they're just as blown away by the concept as the Red Cross was. Right now, there's no other way of sheltering half a million people in a couple of days using materials we can get in a crisis, rather than having a huge waste of money by stockpiling buildings we may not ever need.
That's really something I wanted the community to be thinking about this Burn - if the Big One comes, are the Burners going to be organized and ready to respond.
I hope so.
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Thu, September 6, 2007 - 11:53 PM"The Addis thing provided them with a way of ducking the cultural issues around corporate participation at Burning Man, and they took it."
Stunning insight. Really smart.
Having taken the temp of the community here on tribe (and making it rise occasionally) since the lawsuit, people were pissed about the biz 2.0 article and Marion calling them a demographic to be marketed to. I think it was a surprise since green is what this community should ostensibly embrace.
-
BM must die for BM to live.
Sun, September 9, 2007 - 8:05 AM>>So suppose, next year, there's a Burning Man Business District, and all Corporate Camps have to demonstrate three things. <<
Oh my. I mean - wow.
reading your post made me believe my own cynical dismissals of BM and its culture. I stopped going in 1998 (with a return blip in 2002 to remind me why) because *then* the branding and evil was far too out of hand for me to tolerate any longer. The profanity that BM had become was heinous to me *then*. But THIS:
"So suppose, next year, there's a Burning Man Business District, and all Corporate Camps have to demonstrate three things. "
Oh my fucking god.
Going to Burning Man ever again is a sin against the world and a direct attack on the human species. With the availability of so many other events now, there is just NO excuse for continuing to shit all over this one section of desert pretending it's somehow progressive and freeing.
THANK YOU, Vinay, for so perfectly and innocently demonstrating the insidious evil that seeps effortlessly from BM now. *I am shocked*. I'm deeply surprised and saddened to read the comments here and on the other threads.
NO MORE BM. Move your experience to somewhere else - move it ever year. Don't keep going to the once-pristine desert and pretend there's something sacred about pooing and strewing boa-fragments all over the alkali and hugging yahoos with generators. If it's real, it can be real without being quite this fucking ecologically and ethically devastating.
It's hypocritical to call the arson "Environmental Terrorism". The event generates waste and pollutes the salt flats. No amount of yammering about the attempt to mitigate this problem matters anymore.
BM must die for BM to live. -
-
Re: BM must die for BM to live.
Mon, September 10, 2007 - 12:34 PMFor what it's worth, I think there should definitely be an "old skool" no-holds-barred Burning Man style event at another time in the year, yes, but
THE PRICE OF WINNING IS MERGING WITH THE MAINSTREAM
You can't be alternate forever if you want to move mainstream society. -
-
Re: BM must die for BM to live.
Mon, September 10, 2007 - 6:36 PMGo for it.
Let me know what gets accomplished.
-
-
-
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Thu, September 6, 2007 - 10:41 AMWe worked for ten's of thousands of hours on our projects and one egocentric man named Paul Addis destroyed our contribution for his own self serving message of anger and discontent.
www.burningman.com/environm...tion.html
Shame on him and his followers.
people.tribe.net/22603408-...ffd8225a50
tribes.tribe.net/pauladdisformayor
***
Arraignment is scheduled for Sept. 25 at Pershing County Courthouse in Nevada.
www.pershingcounty.net/districtct.htm
The current Judge and staff of the Lake Township Justice Court are:
Justice of the Peace – Carol A. Nelsen
Senior Court Clerk – Karen Stephens
Court Clerk II – Sheila Reitz
Lake Township Justice Court
400 Main Street
P.O. Box 8
Lovelock , NV 89419
Phone: 775-273-2753
Fax: 775-273-0416
www.pershingcounty.net/justice.htm
***
Gonzo, a Brutal Chrysalis
Seattle Dates:
September 20-22 and 27-29 at The Freehold Theatre, 8PM
October 4-6 Capitol Hill Arts Center (CHAC Showroom), 8PM
LA Dates:
Oct. 12-14, 19-21, and 27-28 at the Whitmore-Lindley Theater
11006 Magnolia Blvd
North Hollywood, CA
(818) 761-0704
www.gonzoduke.com/about.html
"Gonzo, a Brutal Chrysalis presents the life of Hunter S. Thompson, Producers quietly accept full responsibility for shattered icons and existential conversions. All litigation to be tried in federal district court, San Francisco, CA. Patent pending. Everyone reserves their own rights."
*******
Pursue civil damages at:
www.washoelegalservices.org/smclaims.htm
-
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Thu, September 6, 2007 - 2:01 PMSolar, got an email addy for the courts? I want to send a note.
If anyone thinks what Addis did was great, then can you explain why it wouldn't be ok for Death Guild to show up with twelve art cars and say "We're rolling over your rave camp in three minutes to protest your fur, so clear out for safety"? Just don't talk about killing people for having different views; my dad survived three concentration camps so I know how that works. You are all invited to agree with me, but welcome not to! Duh. But if you want me to consider your arguments, just be sure they consider things like the DPW teams whose entire burn experience was messed up.
Vinay; I love you. Your ideas are so forward-thinking. The only way Burning Man the culture can impact default is by interacting with it - this was a bold experiment in that and it was imperfect as all bold things are the first time. The LLC actually tried exactly your 1, 2 & 3, and the participants in the Pavilion complied to the letter - except Playatech, which markets heavily at Burning Man as an experiment in branding as art. I know the Org tried its best to do 1, 2 & 3 because I signed a contract about it - I was allowed to display the only "corporate" logo in the Pavilion, but Crimson agreed only because 1) the logo is not our name, just a "P" on fire, 2) because all our PR at Bman is totally ridiculous rather than serious, and 3) after I agreed not to use any pictures of the Pavilion on the Playatech web site! Most of the exhibits were presented creatively if not as art, except that dumb "ultimate automobile" stand that must have come from Detroit - unfortunately with the pavilion closed, that exhibit got the most views, and colored participants' reactions. I nearly puked, but when the ragtop model comes out I may want one:)
I think Tribe tends to polarize people, and I laugh at arguments about how green or not green Burning Man is. The oil derrick had a bigger footprint than the Addis burn but a lot more of us saw it, so the footprint/person was likely less. So what??!! The footprint of the whole event is insignificant even compared to the footprint of its participants the rest of the year (and BTW subtract from the event's footprint our nominal footprints had we been driving around at home: half the miles at half the fuel efficiency = same impact, and cooling my big house costs more than my little RV).
Anyone reading this has a HUGE footprint versus the average human alive today - so all we can do is make our choices greener tomorrow than they were yesterday. If a few of us every day go beyond that by working on something that can make a million people's footprints 1% greener than yesterday, then we are a bigger part of the solution than we are of the problem but we still aren't "green", and that's as good as it gets. That's where I want to play, and that's where a lot of us were hoping thousands of other burners would want to play too.
When I visited the oil derrick, they made everyone leave hydration packs and backpacks on the ground before climbing it. It appeared that thanks to Addis, terrorism is now on the list of reasons to read the back of the ticket. Sure glad no one stole my camelback with pavilion credentials on it, or the man might have burned three times last week...
If Addis gets off, Burning Man will be far more dangerous next year, and probably less populated. I get that some think that is a good thing, and it is ok with me if you do. But I'd challenge you to find many life forms, community models, companies, countries, or other entities that thrive by getting smaller...
-
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Thu, September 6, 2007 - 2:52 PMOkay, lets have a Monday night burn from now on. Make it a 40-foot effigy of a golf cart or an RV or a dumpster or something.
But Mr. Sunshine, sir ... environmental terrorism? Huh? Burning Man is basically an act of environmental terrorism. There are many whose event basically ends once the gates open and let in the dumpster seeking, trust funded, self-righteous masses. I can understand why many might openly rejoice at the notion of a renegade burn. It takes all kinds to burn a man and sometimes things can take an unexpected turn. Paul is apparently a fairly bright, if twisted, individual. At least he burned it early enough that a new one could be set in place for the regular burn on Saturday. Had he wanted to really mess things up, he would have burned him on Thursday. I don't think he wanted to ruin the event. I think he wanted to communicate. His act was part of a conversation (which apparently isn't finished yet if the courts have their way).
I have an idea. Lets build an 80-foot man and burn him 3 miles out from the trash fence on Monday night with an array of car headlights that spells out "Holy Fucking Shit" and only one arm raises and one finger extends from the arm .... and then go home. -
-
Unsu...
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Thu, September 6, 2007 - 3:33 PMPeople use the word terrorist too much.
just remember! - "Happiness – We’re All In It Together."
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Thu, September 6, 2007 - 3:44 PMGeekster, we're all fairly bright and twisted, LOL. And you can bet there will be a burn next year on Monday night! We can't be the only ones thinking about what to build for that purpose. The question might be whether what burns that night is the art intended to burn, or whether it will be the whole city...even chaos has a plan, and if complete anarchy is accepted by our community or the courts, the chaos will take over, kids will get hurt, and we'll all be sent home never to return. Not going at all would suck even more than waiting to arrive when the tourists do... -
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Thu, September 6, 2007 - 4:45 PM".even chaos has a plan, and if complete anarchy is accepted by our community or the courts, the chaos will take over, kids will get hurt, and we'll all be sent home never to return."
There are several pieces to this.
"if complete anarchy is accepted by our community or the courts"
Which is why Burning Man is done out in the middle of nowhere. We can do insanely stupid stuff and not start a grass fire and burn down Gerlach.
"he chaos will take over, kids will get hurt"
Which is why money was spent applying ink to the back side of the ticket.
"we'll all be sent home never to return"
Which describes nearly 50% of the participants in any given year anyhow.
I don't need to control people. I don't need to be on a committee of people who decides what my neighbor may or may not do. I can see doing what needs to be done to maintain the permit requirements so that the event can be there, but there's nothing in the permit that describes exactly when the man must burn. The man is more of a symbol than my art or your art is. It says something about the entire event. It stands for the event. That act was a catalyst that has many people searching for their navels. People are talking about what it means to them, they are getting things out of their system that maybe they have bottled up for a long time. It allowed others to shine. It bonded some ... radicalized others ... that one single act has had an impact that we are still talking about right here, right now. Nobody died.
Yes, there needs to be a certain amount of order but there also NEEDS to be a certain amount of chaos. The unexpected NEEDS to happen sometimes to force us to drive a new reference point into our understanding of what is.
It was horrible and brilliant all at the same time. If Burning Man were a TV, it would be tuned to every channel at the same time. Everything is there and you are never going to be able to take it all in and right when you are attempting to focus, someone comes along and smashes the screen and it's like "oh, FUCK!".
I don't want to be a shepherd or a sheep. If someone burns my shit early, then it must have needed burning early. I suppose needing the man to burn on Saturday is the one expectation we all carry into the event and expectations are disappointment seeds. Someone burned him early and a lot of those seeds sprouted. It was art. You might not like it, and it might raise strong feelings ... but it was art. I still haven't come to any hard conclusions personally about what it all really means. I suppose we will just have to wait and see.
-
-
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Thu, September 6, 2007 - 5:05 PM> But I'd challenge you to find many life forms, community models, companies, countries, or other entities that thrive by getting smaller...
No problem. Pick up any book by Paul Erlich, professor of population biology at Stanford. Or read the pioneering study of butterfly populations he conducted at Jasper Ridge in the sixties. Regulation (often catastrophic) of over-reproductive populations is fairly well understood these days.
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Thu, September 6, 2007 - 5:18 PMSunshine, I'm totally with you on this but for one thing.
Addis, certainly, did something stupid and dangerous. *At the very least* there were serious safety concerns raised by what he did, never mind flat out vandalism of somebody else's art project.
Uncontestable.
Question is, how do I feel about him for doing it?
And that is interesting. I'm **really** frustrated by the way things went this Burn. I didn't get my visa, Lindsey didn't get to do the Current TV interview (they totally blew her off it seems, we're investigating what gives right now), and the damn arsonist stopped most of the people who could have learned about hexayurts and playatech and so on from seeing them.
But then I look at the guy.
And he's *there.*
He might be mad. He might be bad. But he's freaking ON FIRE (no pun intended.)
So I think, at some level, I'm willing to say "Divine Madness."
Should he escape punishment? Of course not. But given that he's kind of sinned against the gods, or at least Art, is an arson trial the best way to handle this? Do we want to put an artist, however misguided, in jail? For something that is, without any shadow of a doubt, about the most polarizing and interesting thing ever to happen at Burning Man?
I think, in fact, we'd be a much more grown up and mystical community if we chose not to press charges, and instead Banished him - never again to come to Burning Man or associated events, and asked that everybody associated with the community cuts ties to him.
He could be our very own Oedipus - Sacred and Profane, Unholy and Prophetic.
ADDIS ROY
ADDIS REX
ADDIS TYRANUS
I mean I just can't put somebody in jail for bad art or an act of madness.
I can't look at the guy in that video clip and see anything other than somebody who shot for the moon and wound up plastered against a cliff wall in their rocket car, with a few charred art works beside them.
if we look to the courts to enforce law over what is, in essence, a question of metaphysical community standards and aesthetic judgment I feel that we've failed in our mission to create an alternative way of seeing. I'd be happiest if we asked for lenience in the courts, and imposed some kind of community sanction.
If they must jail him, how's about this: A three month sentence, to be served two weeks at a time, labor day weekend, for the next 12 years.
We don't want to destroy this man's life, but we want to make the point: leave what is important to us be. But let's be creative about this, and rise the the level of our aspirations, not sink to the level of the society around us.
Let there be art.
-
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Thu, September 6, 2007 - 4:56 PMKeep your shame to yourself, and stop calling us his followers because we're in those tribes. You're in those tribes yourself, dingledork. -
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Fri, September 7, 2007 - 2:01 PMI feel no shame........... -
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Sat, September 8, 2007 - 8:11 PM>> I feel no shame........... <<
Nor should you, Paul.
I love you. -
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Sat, September 8, 2007 - 11:54 PMActually I feel shame, when I watch myself masturbate in front of a mirror.
I also feel shame knowing that a "The Man" love me...........the dude I "Burnt"
I'm starting to think this sound like some sort of poorly written homo-erotic love tryst gone bad.
On second thought, I'm starting to feel less ashamed about masturbating in front of a mirror when compared to you love for me.
-
-
-
-
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Thu, September 6, 2007 - 3:42 PMAnyone using the word "terrorism" to describe Paul Addis needs to be smacked across the face with a wooden board. I think Addis is a egotistical dumbass, but people have really got to stop throwing the word "terrorism" around. -
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Sun, September 9, 2007 - 2:32 PMActually, I'd call myself a egotistical smart-ass.......
-
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Thu, September 6, 2007 - 3:45 PMPaul Addis is a Burning Man hero. -
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Thu, September 6, 2007 - 4:14 PMHe put the BURNING back into BURNING MAN!
But at the same time, I empathize with the people who poured their blood, sweat and tears into their volunteer work. That is no small thing, but I don't believe it was all for nothing. If you pull back and look at the BIG PICTURE of all this, you see that adversity (in the form of napalm deftly applied and ignited by a prankster) actually galvanized the community and brought it together stronger than before. And that is no small thing either.
What if the Man fell over in a storm or was hit by lightning and was destroyed prematurely? The community would have come together to rebuild the man then, too, but obviously without the anger directed towards one individual.
They have a saying where I come from -- "Doodoo happens"
When doodoo happens, all you can do is clean it up or step over it and continue on your merry way. Or you can sit and whine and bitch and moan about it, and really let it drag you down. Or you can stand and laugh and point at it, like I doo.
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Sun, September 9, 2007 - 2:33 PMNow, if only I had a hero......
-
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Thu, September 6, 2007 - 4:50 PMDude... someone else is calling themselves "Sunshine" ?
I certainly don't want to be confused with this other Sunshine
yeesh
Dear Sunshine,
You are a nutball.
Yours truly,
Sunshine -
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Thu, September 6, 2007 - 4:51 PMOK, this really IS enough to change my moniker...
lemme do that right now -
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Thu, September 6, 2007 - 4:56 PMWhew...
glad that's over with
Dear Sunshine,
You are a nutball.
Yours truly,
SunshineOtter -
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Thu, September 6, 2007 - 5:11 PMfuck
tribe didn't lemme change my moniker.
(gotta figure out how to do that...)
Just don't mistake me for this kook.
sheesh
environmental terrorism?
Dude, you are embarrassing me.
really.
-
-
-
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Thu, September 6, 2007 - 5:01 PM"and you should feel the same way"
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!! WAIT....HAHAHAHAHAHAH
YES MASTER...I WILL FEEL THAT WAY....THE WHOLE FESTY IS AN ACT OF ENVIRONMENTAL TERRORISM....LETS SEE...40,000 PEOPLE TRAMPLING THE DESERT WHILE BURNING A RECOCKULOUS AMOUND OF ALL KINDS OFF DIFFERENT FUELS, BLOWING UP OIL TANKERS, AND LEAVING A 200 MILE TRAIL OF GARBAGE ON THE ROAD.....BURNING THE MAN WAS THE LEAST OF THE ENVIRONMENTS PROBLEMS.....AND ILL TELL YOU NOW...TELLING PEOPLE HOW THEY SHOULD FEEL IS A PRETTY PISS POOR WAY TO MAKE PEOPLE SEE YOUR POINT -
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Thu, September 6, 2007 - 5:07 PMOOPS! Darin accidentally pushed his "caps lock" button again. ;)
But, yeah. What he said. -
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Thu, September 6, 2007 - 5:26 PMsorry...when im posting bulletins about our shows i push it so it shows up better....but i am always guilty of not remembering to turn it off
-
-
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Thu, September 6, 2007 - 5:09 PMArthur, love you man, but uhhhh... terrorism? Can you possibly be serious? And even if you believe that, using the linguistic equivalent of a chainsaw to make your point?
While I do understand much of your position, I'll simply say this:
If it was terrorism, who is it that is being intimidated, or oppressed by the early burning of the man? (And please that I DIDN'T ask: "Who is being disappointed, deprived, etc?.") -
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Thu, September 6, 2007 - 9:00 PM"If it was terrorism, who is it that is being intimidated, or oppressed by the early burning of the man?"
Um...maybe those who built him?
I'm not entirely getting how you can seriously ask this question. -
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Fri, September 7, 2007 - 1:13 PM> I'm not entirely getting how you can seriously ask this question.
Nor am I having an easy time comprehending your reply.
So if it was the "worker bees" who were "terrorized", can you tell me how that terror manifested? Were they afraid to come out of their tents? Intimidated into going home early? Huddled in first camp drinking cocoa? What?
Terrorism. Pfah.
Bunch of Rudy Guiliani quotin' muthafuckas.
-
-
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Thu, September 6, 2007 - 5:18 PMHey we got to burn two men in a green year. I used more propane this year and people loved it. To raise spirits and bring people together by the light of fire, that's green to me. Ground a couple of bombing missions and the entire carbon footprint of burning man is offset. And that some people are NOT bombed in our name is an added bonus. The USA waging an illegal war against a soverign nation that did not attack us, now THAT'S environmental terrorism. Charge: Preaching to the choir. Verdict: Guilty -
-
Unsu...
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Thu, September 6, 2007 - 5:29 PMhahahahahahahahahaha.... oh shit~ Just read your post and thanks for the laugh Sunshine!!!!
hold up... I gotta laugh again....
hahahahahahahahahahhahahahahaha...........
-
-
Unsu...
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Thu, September 6, 2007 - 6:41 PMIt wasn't because of one asshole, that's pure fallacy.
I think it was a combination of several thousand assholes collectively called Yahoos, and BM getting too big for it's britches and starting to collapse under it's own weight.
I say let it collapse. Dozens of regionals have spun off from it, that's where it's future lies.
Also, If we let it collapse we could use that to send a big "fuck you" to uncle sam and all his little cronies who've been trying to tax it out of existence. Suddenly they'd have to cope with the cutoff of all that extra cash they've been raping us for.
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Thu, September 6, 2007 - 6:50 PMI don't understand why assholes get such a bad rap. I mean, really -- try to live without yours for a day and see what happens. -
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Thu, September 6, 2007 - 8:55 PMI despise the term "environmental terrorism" unless it is applied to the true perpetrators of that deed....mining and extraction conglomerates. bio-engineering frankenstein corporations, corporate polluters, mega-lumber harvesters, over-fishing gluttons, nuke industries...get the idea? Paul Addis is an arsonist. arsonist. His act had nothing to do with the environment. Don't buy into the right wing's toxic terminology for environmental activism.
-
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Thu, September 6, 2007 - 8:57 PMDid you drive, or walk, to Burning Man?? -
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Thu, September 6, 2007 - 9:09 PMAw man! I drove! That means I'm not green, huh?
Well, shit. All that time being a tree sitter in Humboldt now means nothing.
-Gabriel
-
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Thu, September 6, 2007 - 9:09 PMWhatever we call the act isn't important, nor is the motivation. What concerns me is what will BLM consider it to be. And I'd bet that "terrorism" will be high on their list, environmental or not. Among BLM's concerns is sure to be, how will BORG be able to control an even larger crowd next year. The end result of this one act could push the burn further away from what burningman used to be, or cause it to end altogether.
my 2 cents,
Paddy -
-
please let's put a cool dbl ought name on it
Thu, September 6, 2007 - 9:21 PMIn order to call something Terrorism that needs to be the motive. Doesn't seem to be the case here - so 'Sunshine' is being a little inflammatory....it happens though, right?
Paul Addis hates GREEN!!!
"he HATES THESE CANS!!!" (the Jerk)
Yeah right. -
-
Just the facts maam......
Fri, September 7, 2007 - 2:53 AMLets not exaggerate please.
It WAS alleged vandalism, and arson.
He is still innocent before proven guilty, (even if the Military Commissions Act has suspended Habeas Corpus)
but it was NOT.
ter·ror·ism /ˈtɛrəˌrɪzəm/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[ter-uh-riz-uhm] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun
1. the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, esp. for political purposes.
2. the state of fear and submission produced by terrorism or terrorization.
3. a terroristic method of governing or of resisting a government.
[Origin: 1785–95; terror + -ism]
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)
Based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2006.
American Heritage Dictionary - Cite This Source
ter·ror·ism (těr'ə-rĭz'əm) Pronunciation Key
n. The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons.
Technically placing a false claim of Terror in this day and age is a Federal Offense and shouldn't be tossed around so lightly.
Its very unfortunate for Art and work and property to be destroyed or damaged.
I do not condone that.
However your claims of Environmental Terrorism has no grounds and you are in error.
You might want to lay those type of claims at the feet of the Conglomerates that sold you the fuel to arrive there.
Or maybe the Federal Forces that drove around collecting your license plate numbers for their database.
-
-
Theme Slaughter
Fri, September 7, 2007 - 8:25 AMOk, so you all don't like the term environmental terrorism. I looked it up on Wiki and the impact if not the intent seems to fit the definition. But since so many of you don't like it, I'll change my assertion to "Theme Slaughter" because Addis gutted the core of this year's theme, and left the event ungreen. I do not think this term is in Wiki, so debate away.
For the record, I think burning the Man early was kind of cool. It was the collateral damage resulting from this burn that I have a problem with, not the act of burning the Man itself. It all could have been prevented if the powers that be had listened to my request for more Ranger shifts at the Man Base.
I sure got a good laugh from Addis' mug shot though... -
-
Unsu...
Re: Theme Slaughter
Fri, September 7, 2007 - 9:12 AMYou know sunshine- this post seems much more level headed than the first one- one that might be valid for .000001 of consideration, too bad you didn't start off this thread that way- but then again, I wouldn't have gotten the huge laugh I had, which I needed.
-
-
-
-
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Fri, September 7, 2007 - 1:35 PMIS this and ISN'T that... Our concepts of what Burning man IS are primarily only meaningful to ourselves, and expressed to everyone else in what you bring to the community. No matter what you think of the act of arson, the cultural ripples and the dialog it's set off have laid the stage for change, and it a'coming...
People seem to forget that this whole thing started with a Cacophony Society event. From the intro on cacophony.org
"The Society is a loosely-structured network of individuals, banded together -- as our name suggests -- by a common love of cultural noise: belief systems, aesthetics, and ways of living striking a note of discord against prevailing harmonies..."
We have set up a resonate harmony in the cycle and structure of life in BRC and this influx of the social rules of the default (No matter how whitewashed) is always going to cause a backlash of discord. And thank Eris for it. Otherwise I'm thinking what we have is an insanely expensive rainbow gathering.
Not everyone gives a shit about the carbon footprint, no matter how much you wish it were so. Live it and make it work where people can see and they'll follow. Shout it from a soapbox and it's just more white noise. -
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Fri, September 7, 2007 - 2:15 PMart sabotage definitely. "poetic terrorism" in the hakim bey sense of the term, but not environmental terrorism in the manner i define it. environmental terrorism is the BLM leasing land to be stripped mined and clear-cut. environmental terrorism is carbon credits for polluters. environmental terrorism is the united states in iraq.
interesting that chris radcliffe of cacaphony seems to have been the one to post addis' bail.
we have a rift in the burner community that can be exemplified by the john law and larry harvey lawsuit. i'm not well-versed enough in the details, nor am i judge or jury in a trial on the subject, so i'll refrain from kneejerkery as much as possible.
i like the idea of john law's suggestion to make the image of the man public domain, though.
as for assholes burning the art of other people: intrinsically uncool. torching the man on monday: still a good idea. torch it on monday every year and then don't have a second burn on saturday. too many knuckleheads turn out for the saturday burn. let's just burn sage on saturday night and chant environmental platitudes. oh, one last thing: let's ditch the fireworks and have a burning man event where a man is built out of wood, put on a platform and allowed to burn 'til he turns to ashes. none of this propane crap, no fireworks display, no eco-expo, just fire and art and wood and maybe a hay bail or two thrown in for good measure. or is that too green to make a worthy spectacle for the pinnacle of our no spectators event? -
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Fri, September 7, 2007 - 2:27 PM"we have a rift in the burner community that can be exemplified by the john law and larry harvey lawsuit."
Personally, I think it goes back farther than the lawsuit, but you are on the right track. -
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Fri, September 7, 2007 - 4:46 PM>Personally, I think it goes back farther than the lawsuit, but you are on the right track.
yes, that's why i said the rift was "exemplified" by the lawsuit, not started by the lawsuit.
from what i gather from people who know addis, he's aligned himself with this "burning man hasn't been cool since '96" argument and run with it. don't know if john law has anything to do with him. from what i hear chris radcliffe posted his bail, so there definitely seems to be some degree of cacaphony society support for his stunt.
environmental terrorism just sounds like such a buzzphrase. in my twenties i was involved with earth first! in the headwaters protests of maxxam's clearcutting of the old growth redwoods. the activists were called "eco-terrorists." eco means "home" so, essentially, activists were, literally, called terrorists of the homeland. to earth first! the "eco-terrorists" were those destroying the biosphere.
addis' stunt was sabotage but not "Terrorism" and definitely not "Environmental Terrorism."
two favorite phrases to come from Addis' burn:
1.) 8-28 Never Forget!
2.) Save the Man! BRC Patriot Act
i also liked the call for a Playaland Security Department to protect us from Terrorism. -
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Sat, September 8, 2007 - 8:29 PM"don't know if john law has anything to do with him"
John Law has nothing to do with him. I talked to John last week (actually we just laughed down the phone at each other - as he was the inventor of the smiley face man, he thought it was hilarious). But he doesn't have anything to do with Paul Addis. Chris Radcliff is a big supporter of the anarchistic act, so he posted the bail.
"addis' stunt was sabotage but not "Terrorism" and definitely not "Environmental Terrorism."
And let's not forget what they did to Judi Bari en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judi_Bari
8/28 Never Forget! Playaland Security will save us from these "terrorists"! -
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Mon, September 10, 2007 - 8:32 PM>John Law has nothing to do with him. I talked to John last week (actually we just laughed down the phone at each other - as he was the inventor of the smiley face man, he thought it was hilarious). But he doesn't have anything to do with Paul Addis. Chris Radcliff is a big supporter of the anarchistic act, so he posted the bail.<
thank you for clarifying. my sense was that Law had nothing to do with him. my sense was that Addis was a "lone nut" but when Radcliffe posted bail, I had to wonder what degree of Cacaphony Society involvement was present. seems there was none and that the bail posting was done as an "after-the-fact" nod of support. -
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Mon, September 10, 2007 - 8:58 PMYeah - John would never be involved in a juvenile stunt like burning the man, he's very mature about the BM thing. He's in a lawsuit with them, but really doesn't give a crap about what happens on the playa.
And the cacophony society in SF has been really pretty dead since Michael Mikel went full time on BM. He used to send out those great newletters with each own different, little toys and stickers... The Man ate the Cacophony Society.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Sun, September 9, 2007 - 2:41 PMSunshine-
I read your post after it has attracted a bunch of responses-- which I haven't read. Just want to say that I agree that Paul's stunt, for whatever it was or wasn't, and whatever should/should not be done about or to him, caused a major de-rail of the green intentions of the event. I personally feel like I missed out on a lot of new ideas that I had been looking forward to.
But the info and the need is still out there, and I'm hoping that you and others will keep on doing what you're doing. And who knows, maybe there will be some other gathering place at some other time where this much creative force can regroup. Afterall, it's not like we will be needing it any less in the future.
namaste~ -
-
Unsu...
Re: It Was Environmental Terrorism
Mon, September 10, 2007 - 7:39 PMNot that my impression of Paul Addis is good (he seems a bit manic or something), but to say BM was anything close to being "green" and that the burning made it significantly less "green" seems a bit far-fetched.
Thats like saying and oil company was less green because they had a truck that failed a smog check.
-
-
Paul Addis Prosecuter
Mon, September 10, 2007 - 1:02 PMLet your thoughts be heard by the Pershing County District Attorney
Jim C. Shirley
Criminal and Juvenile Case: To promote the safety of public by prosecuting criminal and juvenile cases in a fair and judicious manner and to the extent as allowed by law, while understanding and attempting to lessen the impact on victims and witnesses;
Pershing County Court House
400 Main Sreet
P.O. Box 299
Lovelock , NV 89419-0299
(775) 273-2613
Facsimile (775) 273 7058
jshirley@pershingcounty.net